New!
Author resources • Lorehaven Guild
Podcast sponsors • Subscribe for free
Crew manifest Faith statement FAQs
All author resources Lorehaven Guild Subscribe for free

154. What If You Had to Fake Being Genetically Modified? | Enhanced with Candace Kade
Fantastical Truth Podcast, Mar 21, 2023

Exile
Reviews, Mar 17, 2023

153. When Can Deconstructionism Threaten Christian Fiction? | with Michael Young aka ‘Wokal Distance’
Fantastical Truth Podcast, Mar 14, 2023

Library

Find fantastical Christian novels

fantasy · sci-fi · and beyond
middle grade · young adult · grown-ups
All novels Search Add a novel
Enhanced, Candace Kade
Bear Knight, James R. Hannibal
The Wayward, Tabitha Caplinger
Fortified, V. Romas Burton
Canaan Sleeps, Daniel Camomile
Silver Bounty, Victoria McCombs
A Sword for the Immerland King, F. W. Faller
Calor, J. J. Fisher
Once Upon A Ren Faire, A. C. Castillo
The Genesis 6 Project, Michael Ferguson
Exile, Loren G. Warnemuende
Aberration, Cathy McCrumb
The Truth Beyond the Lies, Kathleen Bird
Frost, Winter's Lonely Guardian, E. E. Rawls
Podcast

Get the Fantastical Truth podcast

Podcast sponsors | Subscribe links
Archives Feedback

154. What If You Had to Fake Being Genetically Modified? | Enhanced with Candace Kade
Fantastical Truth, Mar 21, 2023

153. When Can Deconstructionism Threaten Christian Fiction? | with Michael Young aka ‘Wokal Distance’
Fantastical Truth, Mar 14, 2023

152. How Can Christian Fantasy Fans Heal from Church Trauma? | with Marian Jacobs and L. G. McCary
Fantastical Truth, Mar 7, 2023

151. How Can Fantastical Satire Sharpen Our Theology? | The Pilgrim’s Progress Reloaded with David Umstattd
Fantastical Truth, Feb 28, 2023

150. Is the U.S. Government Covering Up Spy Balloons or Alien Spaceships? | with James R. Hannibal
Fantastical Truth, Feb 21, 2023

149. Why Do Christian Fiction Fans Love So Much Romance?
Fantastical Truth, Feb 14, 2023

Quests

Join our monthly digital book quests.

Lorehaven Guild Faith statement FAQs

War in Heaven
Book Quests, March 2023

Rose Petals and Snowflakes
Book Quests, February 2023

Prince Caspian
Book Quests, January 2023

Dream of Kings
Book Quests, December 2022

Reviews

Find fantastical Christian reviews

All reviews Request review

Exile
“This gentle fantasy from Loren G. Warnemuende shows little magic or strange creatures, focusing on complex emotions and relationships.”
—Lorehaven on Mar 17, 2023

Illusion
“Frank Peretti’s last novel creates a romantic world with sci-fi flourishes where likeable heroes, villain twists, and familiar places sell a dramatic performance.”
—Lorehaven on Mar 10, 2023

War in Heaven
“Charles Williams’s classic supernatural thriller pairs a deeply spiritual worldview with perceptive examinations of human nature.”
—Lorehaven on Mar 3, 2023

Bear Knight
“Bear Knight’s quest pacing starts slow but quickens as two plots merge into one, exploring the Christian’s spiritual walk with adventurous aplomb.”
—Lorehaven on Feb 24, 2023

Gifts

Find new gifts for Christian fans

Archives

The original SpecFaith: est. 2006

Speculative Faith | archives

Lorehaven issues (2018–2020)

Order back issues online!
New
Library
Podcast
Quests
Reviews
Gifts
Archives
Lorehaven helps Christian fans explore fantastical stories for Christ’s glory: fantasy, science fiction, and beyond. Articles, the library, reviews, podcasts, gifts, and the Lorehaven Guild community help fans discern and enjoy the best Christian-made fantastical stories, applying their meanings to the real world Jesus Christ calls us to serve. Subscribe free to get any updates you choose and to access the Lorehaven Guild.
Subscribe free to Lorehaven
/ News

‘The Hobbit’ Part 1: Too Dark or Bloated?

I pity the troll who faults the film for dullness or violence.
E. Stephen Burnett on Mar 19, 2013 · 8 comments
thehobbitanunexpectedjourney_trollsfeasting

“Blimey, this stew is too bloated, I say.”

Today The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey releases to Blu-ray and DVD. Now at last some critics will (in this viewer’s view) finally actually see the theatrical version of the film, and choose whether to reevaluate their perceptions of the film’s supposed overdone “darkness” and/or “bloatedness.”

Such as:

Still haven’t seen “The Hobbit” and will probably just wait for the DVD. The more I learn about it, the more it sounds like what I feared — bloated.

[Christian paranormal novelist], personal Facebook post, Feb. 18

J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Hobbit is often viewed as a children’s story in comparison to the more serious Lord of the Rings saga. Indeed, Tolkien imbued his characters in The Hobbit with a dose of whimsy that’s largely absent from the grimmer, gravitas-filled trilogy that follows it.

Peter Jackson didn’t get that memo.

PluggedIn.com reviewer Adam R. Holz, The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey review

I don’t remember the book being that dark.

Wretched Radio (Christian talk program) host Todd Friel, Feb. 1 broadcast

This is like complaining about a (hypothetical) film remake of The Ten Commandments because it includes hints about Israel’s future rejection of its God and perhaps even need for final redemption.

Do we read the Bible that way: piecemeal, as if the Author’s later expansions never existed?

As aspiring author and SF contributor Adam Ross noted about who actually “didn’t get [the] memo”:

“I thought The Hobbit was a charming children’s story about hobbits and dwarves.”

You thought wrong. After finishing LOTR, Tolkien went back to The Hobbit and started work on a Hobbit 2.0, darker and more adult like LOTR, which strengthened the connections between the two and made the dark events of the book, spiders, trolls, orcs, more directly connected to the rising threat of the Shadow in Dol Guldur. It was abandoned because no one wanted it; what remains of it is recorded in the work “The Quest for Erebor”, to be found in the Appendices of LOTR. It is this enhanced Hobbit that Jackson is adapting. So, if you complained about all the “added” material, your complaint lies with Tolkien, not Jackson.

And as for the “bloated” complaint:

[W]ould you really want the Hobbit chopped down into a rush of a single film? Are you actually advocating spending less time in Middle Earth?

Perhaps some viewers’ answers would be yes. In that case, the only response may be this actural unretouched and verbatim quote from another famed fantasy franchise’s wizard, Prof. Dumbledore.

dumbledore_pitythosewhofindlotrboring

Hat tip: the Marcher Lord Press Facebook page.

E. Stephen Burnett
E. Stephen Burnett creates sci-fi and fantasy novels as well as nonfiction, exploring fantastical stories for God’s glory as publisher of Lorehaven.com and cohost of the Fantastical Truth podcast. As the oldest of six, he enjoys connecting with his homeschool roots by speaking at conferences for Christian families and creators. Stephen is coauthor of The Pop Culture Parent: Helping Kids Engage Their World for Christ from New Growth Press (2020, with Ted Turnau and Dr. Jared Moore). Stephen and his wife, Lacy, live in the Austin area, where they help with foster parenting and serve as members of Southern Hills Baptist Church.
Website · Facebook · Instagram · Twitter
  1. Galadriel says:
    March 19, 2013 at 5:52 pm

    I’m waiting for the extended edition.  No complaints about length here.

    Reply
  2. Dana Alan Knight says:
    March 20, 2013 at 2:00 pm

     
    It’s the not-fans who are bored by the story and want to tell the rest of us what we should like. A sub-plot puts the critics out.   And an unnecessary rabbit trail to meet an interesting character is too much. These are the same folks who want to cut Shakespeare’s plays down to West Side Story v1, v2, v3 … etc.
    Not to be dismissive of those who are not fans … but To Be Dismissive of those critics who purport to tell others what to enjoy.  

    If you’re not a fan, fine; but don’t tell me what’s ‘too much.’  The critics love films which celebrate violence, disgusting behavior, and puerile interests.  

    I find about 90% of all film, and 100% of TV and ‘Broadway’ boring:  It’s banal, vile, prurient, and derivative.  I’d chuck it in its totality if it was on my shelf.  I would love to have my life back for all the hours wasted taking friends and family to shows that I would never bother with. 
    So again, … this rant is only for those critics who want to tell me what I’m supposed to like. 
    The Hobbit was the fastest flick I’ve seen in years. 
    Walking out of the theater patrons stopped in the halls and discussed it until the ushers pushed us out.  People shared cards and numbers and email accounts.  The third time I saw the film I saw one 30 something bolt – apparently thinking he was going to see a new version of Thor or something like it.  The theater owner herself showed up at least 4x to see the film and I saw her crying during the finale the last time I saw the film.
    The critics hated it, but consider the box office:  It’s the 14th highest grossing film of all time … and we know the people driving those sales are not the same ones going to see Cider House Rules or Stone or Cameron films. 
    What would you rather have?  The accolades of critics who despise civilization and the commoners who make life possible or bearable?  Or the applause of fans who wait years between artistic productions celebrating their culture, worldview, and spiritual perspective? 
    The producers, creators, imaginative, inspired innovators are starving for material opposing the agit-prop passing for entertainment these days.  That’s why THE HOBBIT sells like hot cakes. 
    Just MHO…
     

    Reply
  3. Bainespal says:
    March 20, 2013 at 6:26 pm

    What about my gripe that the general tone of the movie was too light, too goofy, and perhaps above all too casual?  I know there’s both comic relief and a sense of joviality and jolly in Tolkien.  I would have loved to have seen the jolly elves singing, but I’m not impressed by juvenile, out of character jokes about killing obese goblins.  In my opinion, that is just another kind of cheap sensationalism.
     
    (Really, that one scene with the goblin king was the only thing that I strongly disliked, but that one moment really did ruin the whole thing for me.  Even without that, though, I still disliked the tone set by the dialogue and action.)

    Reply
    • E. Stephen Burnett says:
      March 21, 2013 at 2:34 pm

      In reply, brother, I guess I would ask if you have read the book recently. Until the very last, arguably, it is also “too light, too goofy … too casual.” Very unlike the Middle-earth tone established in The Lord of the Rings. And appropriately so.

      Tolkien was writing first for his children, then for other children.

      Really it’s only at the last that the book itself begins to align with the tone of LotR, with the “dragon is dead, queue happy ending” theme subverted in favor of almost “modern” concerns and challenging ethics, Bilbo’s being forced into politics and a scenario in which it’s impossible not to seem like he’s betraying someone.

      But until then, the story is very much extended fairy-tale. I felt the film drew that out wonderfully, with of course some attempts at dark humor that may not have gone over as well as the book’s dark-humor attempts (such as the Great Goblin death you mentioned). Meanwhile, as for jokes about killing people, I like to point out that Tolkien himself — Tolkien, who fought in wars and indeed explored the tragedy and yet necessity of war in the epic — also included Legolas and Gimli racking up their kills of Orcs/goblins. This was years before video games made crass “scoring” of one’s kills popular. Those who had not read the books, when asked, could easily conclude this was a modern anti-classical addition by Jackson.

      Reply
      • Bainespal says:
        March 21, 2013 at 3:43 pm

        In reply, brother, I guess I would ask if you have read the book recently.

        I read the first four chapters recently, when you were doing the reading group.

        Meanwhile, as for jokes about killing people, I like to point out that Tolkien himself — Tolkien, who fought in wars and indeed explored the tragedy and yet necessity of war in the epic — also included Legolas and Gimli racking up their kills of Orcs/goblins.

        I think you misunderstand me.  I was thinking specifically of that horrible goblin liposuction scene.  That one moment made me mad.  I think my criticism about tone mainly has to do with the dialogue.  I don’t think the wise, fantastic people of the story like Elrond and Gandalf (and Radagast and Galadriel) came across as very wise and fantastic and mysterious.  I have read Elrond’s part in the book recently, and he is far more profound and mysterious and fantastic there.
         
        At any rate, I apologize for the tone of my previous comment.  I’m certain that my complaints are based on my strongly negative reaction to that one moment, the only time that I saw the film.  I know that there were other elements that I liked very much.  I should watch it again some day.  Also, my comments were made partly from the knowledge that it’s Peter Jackson I’m criticizing, and I think he’s big enough to take miscellaneous complaints from miscellaneous nobodies like me, even if by some miracle he were ever to stumble across my comments.

        Reply
  4. Adam says:
    March 20, 2013 at 10:31 pm

    I think it’s important to note that we’re evaluating 1/3 of a story as well. We can’t forget that. Critics and folks who complained that it “took too long to get going” are forgetting that Jackson isn’t just setting up this movie, but character arcs that will carry into two further films. You can’t do that with a five minute rush-job at Bag End just so you can get to the fighting bits. In fact, such objections are entirely infantile. The number of critics who objected to this would be the same ones who would scream that Jackson went for sensational battle extravaganzas by sacrificing character development. There’s just no winning, frankly.

    That, coupled with the generally sneering tone of critics towards fantasy generally, the disaster of the 48 fps-3D fiasco which provoked a number of the negative reviews, the production problems and the fact that Jackson was still editing the thing when the press arrived to watch it (check out those bonus features on the DVD if you don’t believe me), the last-minute expansion of the story goes a long way to explain some of the negativity.

    Frankly, the more I watch it, the more I think Jackson’s version was inevitable and well matched tonally as a Tolkien-Jackson hybrid. 

    Reply
  5. E. Stephen Burnett says:
    March 21, 2013 at 2:28 pm

    Here’s a comment I wrote elsewhere:

    Given that Jackson chose to make the Hobbit films after The Lord of the Rings, it was inevitable that the LotR flavor would be present in the prequels. Anticipating that likely made me enjoy the film even more, and made me love the whimsical and humorous bits that also made it in.

    And given Tolkien’s own attempt to “retcon” The Hobbit, it’s not without precedent.

    Also, following Adam’s remark:

    The number of critics who objected to this would be the same ones who would scream that Jackson went for sensational battle extravaganzas by sacrificing character development.

    Can’t help but agree there. It also may be the case that some of us who really wanted The Hobbit to wow almost all critics as The Lord of the Rings did were disappointed when this didn’t occur — and then couldn’t help but repeat similar criticisms.

    Reply
  6. Kaci says:
    March 21, 2013 at 3:24 pm

    I actually thought it came off wonderfully.  (I have not read the book.)  I expected meandering, slow, and whimsical and got much, much more.

    Reply

Share your fantastical feedback. Cancel reply

Lorehaven magazine, spring 2020

Wear the wonder:
Get exclusive shirts and beyond

Listen to Lorehaven’s podcast

Authors and publishers:
Reach new fans with Lorehaven

Lorehaven helps Christian fans explore fantastical stories for Christ’s glory: fantasy, science fiction, and beyond. Articles, the library, reviews, podcasts, gifts, and the Lorehaven Guild community help fans discern and enjoy the best Christian-made fantastical stories, applying their meanings to the real world Jesus Christ calls us to serve. Subscribe free to get any updates you choose and to access the Lorehaven Guild.
Website · Facebook · Instagram · Twitter