1. Becky Minor says:

    Thanks for weighing in on this, Jeff, and lending some inside perspective to this discussion. I think we as authors get pretty worked up when we worry our domain could somehow be changing or shrinking–which I personally doubt will be the case with someone as influential as Steve Laube handling MLP. I also appreciate what you said about differences in vision. Steve’s vision may be slightly different from yours, but that doesn’t make it bad.
    Onward and upward! May we all see the good in what’s to come, rather than freaking out at “different.”

  2. May we all see the good in what’s to come, rather than freaking out at “different.”

    For fans of this genre: Irony much?

    • dmdutcher says:

      Ironically, no. Geeks REALLY don’t like change much. Geeks are conservative in a way people don’t get, because they value continuity and myth in their fandoms. Even liberal ones, like with the whole “should the next Doctor be a woman?” thing.

    • Geeks are conservative in a way people don’t get, because they value continuity and myth in their fandoms.

      After we squabbled about Santa, it’s my great pleasure to announce that I couldn’t agree more.

    • Fred Warren says:

      I think fans of this genre have a heightened sensitivity to the fact that not all change is constructive. Today Boston Dynamics, tomorrow, maybe, Skynet. We also have this odd tendency to, well, speculate about what the future may bring–and have strong opinions about that.
      Though nobody should get too excited until Mr. Laube lays out his intentions on Jan 6, I don’t think it’s inappropriate in the meantime to identify concerns about CBA influence, the implications of publisher and agency cohabiting, motivation for excluding two apparently very successful products from the deal, etc. We’re writers and fans…we have some investment in this organization and its welfare. Beware of devolving your “discussion forum” into a pep club.
       

      • bainespal says:

        Though nobody should get too excited until Mr. Laube lays out his intentions on Jan 6, I don’t think it’s inappropriate in the meantime to identify concerns about CBA influence, the implications of publisher and agency cohabiting, motivation for excluding two apparently very successful products from the deal, etc.

        Thanks for saying this, Fred. I don’t think disagreement or skepticism are dangerous or destructive, as long as we respect each other’s opinions and each other as people. A culture of happy yes-people is hollow.

        At least, it’s hollow if no one ever goes beyond saying “This is great! I can’t wait to see what God is going to do!” Not that I’m criticizing that sentiment; it’s good if it’s sincere. But not everyone should be content to stop there, even if they ultimately end up supporting the change.

What say you?